Some notes about the Environment

The scale for the waste challenge confronting Britain is enormous. For most of the twentieth century, the waste by-products of industry have been dumped in rivers, landfill sites, the seas, and in the air. This pollution has happened for free – those who cause the pollution have not paid the price.

Gradually the scale of the pollution has been reeled back. Air pollution remains critical in major cities, and carbon pollution challenges the climate change targets. Rivers which were biologically dead have been brought back to some semblance of life, though the initial improvements have begun to level off. Marine pollution remains, especially where it is out of sight, though the dumping of sewerage sludge has been ended.

There has been progress on landfill too. European Directives have gradually borne down on the practice of “dig-a-hole-and-bury-it”, and landfill sites are more regulated now.  Some recycling has been introduced, and occasionally even enforced.

But this progress is against a backdrop of the sheer scale of the waste we are now producing. Packaging and household rubbish are the visible signs to the population, though these are only a part of the much bigger and worrying picture.

What is to be done? The good news is that the scope for improvement is vast, and the reduction of waste is often economically efficient once all the costs are included. Recycling makes sense when those who cause the waste, face the costs. This has become obvious in considering the tsunami of plastic bags the supermarkets have produced to put our shopping in. A small tax creates an enormous change in behaviours.

The plastic bag example is a good way of thinking about what could be done. Though it would not be possible to introduce charges for all the different types of waste, just thinking about how the environment and the economy would be radically different if there were, signals what is out there to be gained. The full circular economy might be an aspiration (and one which might not be particularly economically efficient) but it gets companies and governments thinking. Energy from waste, recycling and composting are all examples of what could be done.

Latest Publication

Why Net Zero Doesn’t Always Mean Net Zero

July 8, 2021

Environment Publication

Interview discussing the challenges of climate change and the importance of facing up to the reality


  • Publication Environment Foreword: The Environment Agency
    May 23, 2003

    Foreword to publication by The Environment Agency. Over the last two decades, the case for using market-based economic instruments in environmental policy has gradually been won. Few policy makers now oppose such instruments in principle. The debate has m
  • Publication Environment Energy Policy and Environmental Impacts
    February 14, 2001

    Published in 'A Mortgaged Future: The Consequences of UK Energy Policy', proceedings of a British Energy seminar, held before a large audience of politicians, civil servants, business people, academics and others.
  • Publication Environment Next steps in Environmental Policy and Economic Instruments
    November 30, 2000

    Paper for the DETR Academic Panel. This paper addresses what might at first sight be deemed an impossible question: how to advise government on further applications of economic instruments to environmental policy, within the constraints of not taxing the
  • Publication Environment Genetically Modified Organisms: Some Arguments
    April 12, 2000

    There are a variety of claims against the development and use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This paper examines these arguments.
  • Publication Environment Environmental Policy in the UK
    March 1, 2000

    Edited by Dieter Helm, published March 2000 by Blackwell
1 2 3 4 5 6

Receive monthly updates from Dieter Helm

© Dieter Helm. All rights reserved.Copyright & Terms